High CourtsDivision Bench(1916) 02 CAL CK 0035

V.R. Alexander vs R.W. Connor and Others

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 18 February 1916 · Citation: 34 Ind. Cas. 305

HON’BLE JUDGES
Walmsley, J · Chitty, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 142 words
1.

In this case, the procedure of the learned Magistrate in discharging the accused u/s 253, Criminal Procedure Code, in consequence of the absence of the complainant was not in accordance with law. Section 253 only provides for the discharge of an accused where the Magistrate finds that no case-has been made out or he considers the charge to be groundless. The discharge in the absence of the complainant can only be made u/s 259, Criminal Procedure Code, and then only in a case where the offence may be lawfully compounded. We must accordingly set aside the order of discharge and direct a further enquiry into the case. As on 8th December 1915 the learned Magistrate expressed a strong opinion with regard to the case, we direct that, the Chief Presidency Magistrate do transfer the case to some other Magistrate for trial.