High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 11 UK CK 0027

Vivek Yadav vs State Of Uttarakhand & Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 9 November 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (S/S) No. 1418 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 193 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

Petitioner's father was serving on a Group-D post of Chaukidar in Nagar Nigam, Haridwar, who died in harness on 21.09.2016. Petitioner's mother was also serving on a Group-D post of Peon in Nagar Nigam, Haridwar, who has retired on 31.03.2017.

3.

Upon death of his father, petitioner applied for compassionate appointment, however, his application was rejected only on the ground that his mother was also employed with Nagar Nigam, Haridwar.

4.

Since petitioner's mother retired soon after death of her husband and no earning member is left in the family, therefore, the reason assigned for rejection of petitioner's application does not appear to be proper.

5.

In such view of the matter, the orders impugned in the writ petition are liable to be quashed and are hereby quashed.

6.

The writ petition is allowed and petitioner shall be at liberty to apply afresh for compassionate appointment. If he makes an application, the same shall be considered in accordance with law, as early as possible but, not later than four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.