Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2023) 07 NCLAT CK 0043

Vivek Raheja vs Pramod Kumar Sharma, Resolution Professional

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 12 July 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ashok Bhushan, Chairperson · Barun Mitra, Member (T)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 810 Of 2023 & I.A. No. 2731 Of 2023

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 172 words
1.

This appeal has been filed against the order dated 21.04.2023 passed in I.A. No. 897/2019 filed by the Authorised Representative, (the Appellant). The Adjudicating Authority observed that authorised representative is entitled to proceed with the matter in accordance with law if they have any grievance with the RP.

2.

Learned Counsel for RP submits that as per the Regulations, the request by AR should contain consent of 33% of the allottees as on date to enable the RP to convene the meeting of the CoC and to consider in the meeting the agenda.

3.

Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that Appellant shall make appropriate request to the RP with the requisite majority as required by Regulation in view of the Regulations 18 of the CIRP Regulations 2016. The Adjudicating Authority had already granted such liberty through the authorised agency like CDSL or NSDL.

4.

We, thus,  are of the view that  there is no ground to interfere with the order impugned.

With the above observations, the Appeal is disposed of.