Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2024) 01 NCLT CK 3202

Vivek Bansal vs M/s. Smartec Systems Private Limited

National Company Law Tribunal · Decided on 10 January 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajeev Bhardwaj, Member (Judicial) · Sanjay Puri, Member (Technical)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
I.A. No. 1032/2023 in IA No.198/2021 in C.P. (IB) No. 620/9/HDB/2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

40 paragraphs · 1,103 words

Per : Bench

1.

This Application is filed by the Liquidator of the Corporate Debtor (CD) M/s. Smartec Systems Private Limited under Section 54(1) of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 r/w Regulation 45(3) of Insolvency & Bankruptcy Board of India (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016, seeking for dissolution of the Corporate Debtor.

Brief facts of the Application:

2.

The Liquidation Order was issued by the Tribunal through an Order dated 13.11.2019, calling for the liquidation of M/s. Smartec Systems Private Limited (CD). The Applicant was subsequently appointed as the Liquidator by an Order dated 19.11.2019.

3.

Following the appointment, the Liquidator issued a public announcement in Form-B on 06.12.2019, seeking claims from the CD's creditors. Three claims were received from the creditors, viz: 1) Mr. Vivek Bansal, Operational Creditor on 03.01.2020, 2) Bank of Baroda, Financial Creditor on 04.01.2020, and 3) ESI, Operational Creditor on 24.11.2021. The claims from Operational and Financial Creditors couldn't be verified by the Liquidator due to the absence of the CD's books of accounts. The ESI claim was initially rejected for late submission but later approved after a delay of 688 days, sanctioned by the Adjudicating Authority.

4.

The Liquidator reported that aside from the Vehicle (Audi car with Registration No. AP09CN3900), no other assets were identified in the CD. With assistance from Police Officers and Win Win Financial Services (Debt and Asset Recovery Management), the vehicle was located and placed under the custody of Win Win Financial Services.

5.

During the hearing on 03.01.2023, the Adjudicating Authority instructed the Liquidator to sell the Audi car (Registration No. AP09CN3900) by way of a physical auction.

6.

The Liquidator engaged two Registered Valuers, as per Regulations 27 & 35 of IBBI (Insolvency Resolution Process of Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016, to assess the car's value. The valuation details were as follows:

ValuerRegistered Valuer 1 (Rs.)Registered Valuer 2 (Rs.)
Fair value6,25,0006,00,000
Liquidation value4,10,0004,00,000
Average5,17,5005,00,000
7.

An advertisement on 12.01.2023 in Financial Express and Nava Telangana newspaper announced the Vehicle auction Sale Notice.1 The auction, held on 19.01.2023, two bidders were participated in the auction, out of which, Mr. Suresh Kumar Reddy emerging as the Successful Bidder, offering Rs.5,06,000/-. The Liquidation Bank Account (SBSPL(UL)) was opened in the State Bank of India, and the auction proceeds were deposited in the same account.

8.

The Liquidator disbursed the proceeds from the Audi Car auction. The Bank Account in the name of SBSPL(UL) was closed after all amounts were disbursed.

9.

Documents from the Insolvency Resolution Professional indicated old dues from debtors as of 31st October 2018. Debtors were contacted for payment, but they denied liability and instead raised claims against the CD.2

10.

The CD has no remaining assets. A Stakeholders Consultancy Committee meeting3 convened on 28.04.2023, with attendees including Sanjay Kumar Sharda (Liquidator), Mr. Ramkrishna (Representative of Bank of Baroda - Financial Creditor), Mr. Harinath (Representative of Bank of Baroda - Financial Creditor), and Mr. Rajeev Nandan Rai (Representative of Employee State Insurance Corporation - Operational Creditor). The Liquidator presented the CD’s status, and all members concurred on the company's dissolution due to the absence of assets.

11.

The Liquidator is submitting the Compliance Certificate4 in the form of Form H and the Final Accounts5 related to the proceeds' disbursement for the Company's dissolution.

12.

Given the aforementioned facts, the Liquidator requests the Tribunal to order the dissolution of the Corporate Debtor Company.

Decision on the Application:

13.

We have perused the contents of the Application and heard the Counsel appearing for the Liquidator.

14.

At the outset, it may be stated that Section 54 of the IBC lays down the criteria for dissolution of the Corporate Debtor.

“Section 54 - Dissolution of Corporate Debtor.

(1)

Where the assets of the corporate debtor have been completely liquidated, the liquidator shall make an application to the Adjudicating Authority for the dissolution of such corporate debtor.

(2)

The Adjudicating Authority shall on application filed by the liquidator under sub-section (1) order that the corporate debtor shall be dissolved from the date of that order and the corporate debtor shall be dissolved accordingly.

(3)

A copy of an order under sub-section (2) shall within seven days from the date of such order, be forwarded to the authority with which the corporate debtor is registered”.

15.

Regulation 45 of Insolvency & Bankruptcy Board of India (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016 reads as under:-

“Regulation 45: Final report prior to dissolution.

(1)

When the corporate debtor is liquidated, the liquidator shall make an account of the liquidation, showing how it has been conducted and how the corporate debtor’s assets have been liquidated.

(2)

If the liquidation cost exceeds the estimated liquidation cost provided in the Preliminary Report, the liquidator shall explain the reasons for the same.

(3)

The liquidator shall submit an application along with the final report and the compliance certificate in form H to the Adjudicating Authority for –

(a)

closure of the liquidation process of the corporate debtor where the corporate debtor is sold as a going concern; or

(b)

for the dissolution of the corporate debtor, in cases not covered under clause (a).]”.

16.

We are satisfied that the criteria laid down under law has been fully complied with. As such, the Corporate Debtor is liable to be dissolved. Hence, we hereby order dissolution of the Corporate Debtor as under:-

a. The Corporate Debtor M/s. Smartec Systems Private Limited stands dissolved from the date of this Order, in terms of Section 54(2) of IBC, 2016, and the Liquidator stands relieved.

b. The Liquidator is directed to send the copy of this Order within 7 days from the date of pronouncement to the Registrar of Companies, Hyderabad.

c. Upon dissolution of the Corporate Debtor, the records of the Company which are in possession of the Liquidator, be handed over by the Liquidator to the IBBI.

d. The Registry is also directed to communicate this order to the Registrar of Companies, Hyderabad for updating the master data.

e. A copy of this order be also forwarded to the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Board of India, New Delhi.

f. In terms of the above, IA No.1032 of 2023 in IA No.198 of 2021 filed by the Liquidator appointed for M/s. Smartec Systems Private Limited (Corporate Debtor) for dissolution of the Company under Section 54(2) of IBC, 2016 stands disposed of accordingly. Since the Corporate Debtor stood dissolved vide this order and no proceedings are now pending, therefore, the Registry is directed to consign the file to records.

Footnotes

  1. 1.Pg 5-6 of the Application.
  2. 2.Pg 8-13 of the Application.
  3. 3.Pg 14-16 of the Appliation.
  4. 4.Pg 17-21 of the Application.
  5. 5.Pg 7 of the Application.