Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2024) 12 NCLAT CK 1539

Vishwajeet Jhavar & Ors. vs Catalyst Trusteeship Ltd & Anr.

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi · Decided on 23 December 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ashok Bhushan, Chairperson · Barun Mitra, Member (Technical)
CASE NUMBER
Comp. App. (AT) (Ins) No. 1797 of 2024 & I.A. No. 8872, 8875 of 2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 387 words

O R D E R

23.12.2024: This is an appeal filed against the order dated 06.09.2024 in CP (IB) No. 254 of 2023 filed by Catalyst Trusteeship Ltd. by which Section 7 application has been admitted. The appellant has filed this appeal in which following interim order was passed on 18.09.2024.

“O R D E R

(Hybrid Mode)

“18.09.2024: Ld. Counsel for the Appellant submits that appellant has given a proposal for settlement. Counsel appearing for Respondent No. 1 submits that they have received the proposal last night only and they require four weeks’ time for settlement of the proposal. List this appeal on 17.10.2024. In the meantime, Committee of Creditors in pursuance of the impugned order shall not be constituted.”

The Ld. Counsel for the appellant as well as the financial creditor submits that terms of settlement have been entered between the parties.

2.

Ld. Counsel for the appellant submits that in view the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in Glas Trust Company LLC vs Byju Raveendran, Civil Appeal No. 9986 of 2024; the course open for the Financial Creditor is to file an application under 12A through the IRP by giving FORM- FA. An IA has been filed bearing no. 8875/ 2024 and 8872 of 2024 by two home buyers their apprehension is that amount of the project Orial which is to come to the corporate debtor may be utilised for the purpose of settlement. The Ld. Counsel for the appellant as well as Financial Creditor have submitted that no amount from corporate debtor is being utilised for settlement purpose.

3.

In view of the facts, we are of the view that no purpose shall be served in keeping the appeal pending. Financial Creditor is given liberty to file an application under Section 12A through IRP as per the judgment of Supreme Court in Glass Trust which may be considered and it shall be open for intervener or any other claimant to file appropriate objections before the Adjudicating Authority at the time of hearing of Section 12A application.

4.

Let the Financial Creditor file the application within two weeks from today. Till the application under Section 12A is disposed of no further steps be taken and further steps shall be taken as per the order of the Adjudicating Authority. The appeal is disposed of accordingly.