High CourtsSingle Bench(2023) 10 MAD CK 0149

Vishnukuma vs State

Madras High Court · Decided on 30 October 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
C.V.Karthikeyan, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Original Petition No. 23686 Of 2023

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 355 words

C.V.Karthikeyan, J

1.

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 01.10.2023 for the offences punishable under Section 328 of IPC r/w 24(1) of COTPA Act, in Crime No.57 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2.

It is stated that the petitioner had been in possession of 58 kgs of banned tobacco products.

3.

It is also stated that there are three previous cases pending against the petitioner herein but however, taking into consideration the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions:

4.

Accordingly, the petitioner shall make a non-refundable deposit of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) directly to the credit of "The Dean/Medical Officer, Government General Hospital, Coimbatore", without prejudice to his rights and contentions before the trial Court, on such deposit and production of proof, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate-1, Coimbatore, and on further conditions that:

[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily Morning at 10.30 a.m., and Evening at 5.30 p.m., until further orders.

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.