High CourtsSingle Bench(2024) 09 DEL CK 1942

Vishal Nehra & Ors. vs The State, Govt. Of NCT Of Delhi & Anr.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 23 September 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anoop Kumar Mendiratta, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
W.P.(CRL) 2845/2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 480 words

ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J (ORAL)

CRL.M.A. 27670/2024

Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions.

Application stands disposed of.

W.P.(CRL) 2845/2024

1.

Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (‘BNSS’) has been preferred on behalf of petitioners for quashing of FIR No.0612/2022, under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at P.S.: Malviya Nagar and proceedings emanating therefrom.

2.

Issue notice. Learned ASC for the State and learned counsel for respondent No.2 along with respondent No. 2 in person appear on advance notice and accept notice.

3.

In brief, as per the case of the petitioners, marriage between petitioner No.1 and respondent No. 2 was solemnized according to Hindu Rites and ceremonies on 09.03.2015. No child was born out of the wedlock. Due to matrimonial differences, petitioner No.1 and respondent No. 2 started living separately. On complaint of respondent No. 2, present FIR was registered on 16.10.2022.

4.

The disputes are stated to have been amicably settled between the parties in terms of Settlement Deed dated 24.01.2024. Petition under Section 13B(2) of Hindu Marriage Act for second motion of divorce by way of mutual consent, is stated to be listed for 25.09.2024 before the learned Family Judge, District Ghaziabad, U.P.

5.

Respondent No.2 who is present in person, confirms the same and submits that disputes have been amicably settled between the parties and an amount of Rs.6,25,000/- is to be received at the stage of second motion of divorce. She further submits that she has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed.

6.

Learned ASC for the State submits that in view of amicable settlement between the parties, he has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed.

7.

Petitioners and respondent No. 2 are present in person and have been identified by SI Shajid Hussain, PS: Malviya Nagar. I have interacted with the parties and they confirm that the matter has been amicably settled between them without any threat, pressure or coercion. Respondent No. 2 also states that nothing remains to be further adjudicated upon between the parties and she has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed.

8.

Considering the facts and circumstances, since the matter has been amicably settled between the parties, no useful purpose shall be served by keeping the case pending. It would be nothing but an abuse of the process of Court. The chances of conviction are bleak in view of amicable settlement between the parties. Consequently, FIR No.0612/2022, under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at P.S.: Malviya Nagar and proceedings emanating therefrom stand quashed, subject to compliance of the terms and conditions of Settlement Deed dated 24.01.2024 by the respective parties.

Petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

A copy of this order be forwarded to learned Trial Court for information.