High CourtsSingle Bench(2024) 02 RAJ CK 0157

Viram Lal Balotiya vs Arif Mohammad Pathan And Others

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 1 February 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Garg, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 415 Of 2023

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 309 words

Manoj Kumar Garg, J

Instant cr. Misc. application has been filed by the complainant/applicant for recalling of the order dated 17.03.2023, passed by this Court in SB Cr. Misc. Petition No.406/2023 whereby the misc. petition was allowed and the impugned FIR lodged against the accused-respondents was quashed solely on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.

Counsel for the complainant/applicant submits that during the pendency of the misc. petition, compromise was arrived at between the complainant/applicant and accused-respondent No.1 Arif Mohd. Pathan, but the accused-respondent No.1 failed to comply with the terms and conditions of the compromise. Therefore, it is prayed that the order dated 17.03.2023 may be recalled and Police be directed to re-commence investigation in the FIR impugned.

Per contra, learned counsel for accused-respondents No.3 & 4 submits that no specific role has been assigned to accused-respondent Nos.3 & 4. It is further submitted that a written compromise was executed between the complainant/applicant and accused-respondent No.1 Arif Mohd. Pathan and accused-respondents No.3 & 4 have nothing to do with the alleged crime. Therefore, it is prayed that the present misc. application for recalling the order dated 17.03.2023 may be dismissed.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the misc. application.

The criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. was allowed by this Court solely on the basis of compromise arrived at between the complainant/applicant and respondent No.1 Arif Mohd. Pathan. Now, the complainant/applicant himself submits that the accused-respondent No.1 has violated the terms and conditions of the compromise. In such circumstances, this Court deems it proper to recall the order dated 17.03.2023 passed in SB Cr. Misc. Petition No.406/2023.

Hence, the Cr. Misc. application is allowed. The order dated 17.03.2023, passed by this Court in SB Cr. Misc. Petition No.406/2023 is hereby recalled. The Police is directed to re-commence investigation in the FIR impugned.