High CourtsDivision Bench(2014) 04 RAJ CK 0163

Vipin Kumar Yadav vs RSRTC

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 2 April 2014 · Citation: (2014) 2 WLN 545

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dinesh Maheshwari, J · Banwari Lal Sharma, J
CASE NUMBER
Civil Special Appeal (W) No. 95/2013

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 219 words

Dinesh Maheshwari, J.—This appeal is reportedly time barred by 428 days. An application seeking condonation of delay has been filed essentially stating the reason for delay in the manner that the petitioner-appellant inquired about the proceedings in the petition filed by him in the month of December 2012. The order impugned was passed way-back on 28.02.2011. The reasons stated in the application hardly make out sufficient cause of condonation of delay of over one year.

2.

Apart from the above, it appears that the petition was filed in the Year 2011 in relation to the recruitment to the post of Conductor, as was taken up by the respondent Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, in the month of March 2010. In relation to the recruitment process of the Year 2010, we find no reason to entertain this intra Court appeal now at this stage.

3.

Even otherwise, the learned Single Judge has found that the petitioner who was, admittedly, lacking in eligibility on the appointed date, was not entitled to be considered for such recruitment. The order so passed by the learned Single Judge remains just and proper and does not disclose any error so as to call for interference.

4.

For all the reasons above, we are not persuaded to entertain this intra Court appeal. The appeal stands dismissed.