High CourtsSingle Bench(2024) 03 SHI CK 0067

Vinod Kumar vs State Of H.P. And Others

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 20 March 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ajay Mohan Goel, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 2329 Of 2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 219 words

Ajay Mohan Goel, J

1.

Notice confined to respondents No. 1 to 3, as no adverse order is being passed against the private respondent, therefore, no notice is being issued to him. Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 3.

2.

By way of this petition, the petitioner is challenging the office order dated 14.03.2024, in terms whereof, the petitioner has been transferred from GSSS, Khani, District Mandi, H.P. to GSSS, Mehridhar, District Mandi, without TTA and joining time, on the abasis of a DO Note issue by respondent No. 4.

3.

On a query put to learned Counsel for the petitioner as to what is the stay of the petitioner are the present place of posting, he apprised the Court that though stay of the petitioner there is complete and but without there being any request of the petitioner for transfer, he has been transferred without payment of TTA and joining time.

4.

Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner has completed his normal tenure at the present place of posting, the Court is not interfering with the impugned transfer order but respondents are directed to forthwith release him TTA and give him joining time as per rules. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any also stand disposed of accordingly.