Supreme CourtFull Bench(2000) 01 SC CK 0194

Vinod Kumar Agarwal vs Ratan Devi and Others

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 31 January 2000 · Citation: (2000) 7 JT 339

HON’BLE JUDGES
Y.K. Sabharwal, J · S.B. Majmudar, J · D.P. Mohapatra, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Petitioner for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No. 123 of 2000

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 183 words
1.

Having heard learned Counsel for the Petitioner we do not think that this is a fit case for our interference under Article 136 of the Constitution of India against/ the order of the Tribunal and as confirmed by the High Court not granting the prayer of the Plaintiff - Petitioner for appointment of receiver pending his suit for partition and separate possession of his 1/4th share in the suit property.

2.

However, we are inclined to accept his alternative prayer that at least the suit in question, pending in the court of learned District Judge, Jaipur City, between Vinod Kumar and Ratan Devi and Ors. deserves to be expedited.

3.

The learned District Judge, Jaipur City is requested to dispose of the said suit after hearing the parties, on merits within a period of six months from the receipt of a copy of this order at his end.

4.

The Office of this Court is directed to send a copy of this order to the learned District Judge, Jaipur City, for information and necessary action.

5.

The SLP is disposed of accordingly.