High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 05 CHH CK 0059

Vinit Singh vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 10 May 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
NK Chandravanshi, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
MCRCA No. 1730 Of 2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

24 paragraphs · 503 words

N.K. Chandravanshi,

JÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â

                        Â

1.

I.A. Nos. 2 & 3 application for urgent hearing, I.A. No.4 application for hearing during summer vacation and I.A. No.5 application for exemption

from filing affidavit are allowed.

2.

I.A. No.1 application for grant of ad-interim bail is not pressed as the matter is heard finally.

3.

This is first application for grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. preferred by the applicant.

4.

The applicant is apprehending his arrest in connection with Crime No.482/2020 registered at Police Station- Sirgitti, District Bilaspur (C.G.), for

offence punishable under Sections 294, 323, 327, 34 & 506 of IPC.

5.

Case of the prosecution, in brief is that FIR was lodged against the applicant on 18/10/2020 by father of applicant alleging that he demanded money

for consuming liquor and when he refused he committed obscene act and caused hurt on his face and gave threatened to cause his death.

6.

Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case, there is property dispute

between brothers of the applicant and father, applicant is a social worker, except under Section 327 of IPC all other offences are bailable, therefore,

he may be granted anticipatory bail.

7.

On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes the bail application. He further submitted that there is no criminal antecedents of the

applicant reported in police case diary.

8.

Looking to above mentioned facts and circumstances of the case, considering the fact that there is property dispute between the parties, no criminal

antecedent of the applicant has been shown, this Court is inclined to give benefit of anticipatory bail to the accused.

9.

Consequently, application filed under Section 438 of CrPC is allowed allowed. It is directed that in the event of arrest of the Applicant in connection

with the aforesaid offence, he shall be released on bail by the officer arresting him on executing a personal bond in sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety

in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned Investigating Officer. The Applicant shall also abide by the following conditions :

(i) that the Applicant shall make himself available for interrogation before the concerned police officer as and when required;

(ii) that the Applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat undue influence to the prosecution witness

(iii) the Applicant shall appear before the concerned Court on each and every date given to him by the said Court till disposal of the trial.