Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2026) 04 ITAT CK 3830

Vineet Raheja vs ITO

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 15 April 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Yogesh Kumar U.S., Judicial Member · Manish Agarwal, Accountant Member
RESULT
Partly Allowed
CASE NUMBER
ITA No. 3209/Del/2025 (A.Y 2020-21)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 341 words

PER YOGESH KUMAR, U.S. JM:

The present appeal is filed by the Assessee against the order of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals/ National Faceless Appeal Centre (‘Ld. CIT(A)/NFAC’ for short), New Delhi dated 26/03/2025 for the Assessment Year 20209-21.

2.

Brief facts of the case are that, an assessment order came to be passed on23/09/2022 u/s 143(3) r.w. Section 144(B) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('Act' for short) by making certain additions. The Assessee preferred an Appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) which has been dismissed on 26/03/2025 vide order impugned. As against the order of the Ld. CIT(A) dated 26/03/2025, Assessee preferred the present Appeal.

3.

Counsel for the Assessee submitted that A.O. has not considered the documents produced by the Assessee and made the addition on the other hand, CIT(A) erroneously upheld the addition made by the A.O. therefore, submitted that the order impugned passed in violation of principals of natural justice. Thus, sought for allowing the Appeal.

4.

Per contra, the Ld. Department's Representative submitted that the CIT(A) had decided the Appeal on merits, which is in accordance with law, thus the same requires no interference. Accordingly, by relying on the orders of the Lower Authorities sought for dismissal of the Appeal.

5.

We have heard both the parties and perused the material available on record. It is the specific case of the Assessee, that the documents produced by the assessee have not been considered by the A.O., to substantiate the same, A.R has taken us through the assessment order as well as order of the CIT(A). In view of the above, in the interest of justice, we deem it fit to restore the issue to the file of the A.O. for de-novo assessment. Needless to say, the A.O. shall provide opportunity of being heard to the Assessee and produce any document in support of his claim before the A.O. The Assessee is also directed to participate in assessment proceedings without fail.

6.

In the result, the Appeal of the Appellant is partly allowed for statistical purpose.