High CourtsDivision Bench(2019) 01 P&H CK 0313

Vinay Kumar vs State Bank Of India

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 8 January 2019

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ajay Kumar Mittal, J · Manjari Nehru Kaul, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 12 Of 2019

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 344 words

Ajay Kumar Mittal, J

1.

The instant petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari for quashing the demand notice (Annexure P-2) issued under Section 13(2) of Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (in short 'the Act') by the respondent-Bank.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that after issuance of notice under Section 13(4) of the Act, the petitioner filed a representation (Annexure P-11) to the respondent bank on 01.12.2018. However, the petitioner filed writ petition bearing CWP No.30956 of 2018 on 04.12.2018, which was dismissed as withdrawn on 06.12.2018 with liberty to avail the alternative remedies as it was filed without waiting for reasonable time for taking the action by the respondent-bank.

3.

Mr. Saurabh Bhardwaj, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of respondent-bank and pointed out that earlier the petitioner had filed CWP No.30404 of 2018 challenging the notice dated 19.11.2018 (Annexure P-4), which was dismissed as withdrawn on 30.11.2018 with liberty to avail the alternative remedies. It was submitted that there is no reference to the said writ petition and therefore, the petitioner has concealed material facts from this Court.

4.

On a perusal of the writ petition, particularly in para 23 thereof where we find that there is no reference to CWP No.30404 of 2018 and therefore, there is concealment of facts. Para 23 of the writ petition reads as under:

"That the petitioner earlier approached this Hon'ble Court through CWP No.30956 of 2018, which was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty by this Hon'ble Court except this no such or similar petition has been filed by the petitioners in this Hon'ble Court or in the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India. Copy of such order is annexed herein as Annexure P-14."

5.

It is, thus, clear that the petitioner had earlier filed CWP No.30404 of 2018, which was dismissed as withdrawn on 30.11.2018 but this fact has been concealed from this Court. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed.