High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 07 CHH CK 0046

Vikki Manikpuri vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 3 July 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
RAJENDRA CHANDRA SINGH SAMANT , J
RESULT
Disposed off
CASE NUMBER
MCRC No. 3419 of 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 419 words
1.

This is the first bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 on behalf of the applicant for grant of regular bail to

him as he is in custody in connection with Crime No.459/2017 registered at Police Station- Mohan Nagar, District â€" Durg(C.G.) for the offence

punishable under Sections 354 & 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 8 of Protection of Children from sexual offences Act, 2012.

2.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Applicant is in jail since 1.4.2018.

After completion of investigation, charge-sheet has already been filed. It is submitted that the applicant was granted bail by the trial Court on 2.1.2018

and on that basis he had furnished bail bonds on 20.2.2018 and was released on bail. Subsequently, on 27.3.2018 it was discovered that the bond

furnished by surety Vishnu Prasad was based on forged document and therefore, without affording any opportunity to the applicant to explain, a non-

bailable warrant was issued against the applicant and then, he was arrested on 1.4.2018 and placed under detention. Thereafter this applicant filed bail

application before the Court below and the same has been rejected on the ground that this applicant has furnished bail bonds of surety by using forged

documents. Hence, it is prayed that this applicant may be ordered to be released on bail.

3.

Learned State counsel opposes the bail application and submissions made in this respect.

4.

Heard both the parties and perused the case diary.

5.

There is no need to consider this case on merits because there is already an order in favour of applicant passed by the Court below on 2.1.2018

granting bail to him and the said order has yet not been cancelled as per provisions contained Section 439(2) of the CrPC. From perusal of the order

passed by the trial Court, it is clear that only second bail application of the applicant for grant of bail was rejected and it does not state about the

cancellation of the order dated 2.1.2018 passed earlier by the said Court granting bail to the applicant herein. Hence, the said order granting bail is still

in existence and if the applicant is willing to furnish bail bond in accordance with the order dated 2.1.2018 of the Court below, he can before the trial

Court concerned, then he shall be to released on bail after due verification.

6.

The application is accordingly disposed off.