High CourtsSingle Bench(2013) 08 P&H CK 0398

Vikas Vashishat @ Vicky vs State of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 16 August 2013

HON’BLE JUDGES
Jitendra Chauhan, J
CASE NUMBER
CRM No. M-26152 of 2013

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 185 words

Jitendra Chauhan, J.—By filing the present petition u/s 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioner has sought pre-arrest bail in case FIR No. 191 dated 28.6.2012, registered under Sections 304B of the Indian Penal Code at Police Station Zirakpur, District SAS Nagar. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is brother-in-law of the deceased; the case u/s 304-B of IPC is not made out against the petitioner and he has been residing separately. Moreover, the petitioner being brother-in-law had no authority and was not likely to be the beneficiary of any dowry article.

2.

Heard.

3.

However, from the perusal of the case file, it emerges that the supplementary challan was filed after inquiry conducted by DSP, Dera Bassi, wherein the petitioner has been nominated as an accused. The petitioner is a proclaimed offender. He has successfully evaded the process of the court.

4.

Keeping in view the allegations levelled against the petitioner and his conduct, without commenting on the merit of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant any discretionary relief to him. Dismissed.