Supreme CourtDivision Bench(2000) 07 SC CK 0055

Vikas Adhikari, Panchayat Samiti and Another vs Hira Lal

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 20 July 2000 · Citation: (2000) 87 FLR 290 : (2000) 10 JT 317 : (2000) 2 LLJ 1130 : (2001) 9 SCC 389

HON’BLE JUDGES
Shivaraj V. Patil, J · S. Rajendra Babu, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal No. 2222 of 1998

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 201 words
1.

Shri Aruneshwar Gupta, learned Counsel for the appellants attacked the order under appeal by raising the question whether the respondent is a workman working in an industry and whether he should approach the Industrial Tribunal or the Labour Court under the Industrial Disputes Act.

2.

We do not think that such an issue should be examined. The learned Counsel relied upon the decision of this Court in Ashwani Kumar and others Vs. State of Bihar and others, etc. etc., . The question whether a government servant should also be a workman will have to be examined on the facts of each case. As such a question has not been raised specifically before the High Court, we refuse to go into it. No other point is urged.

3.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, we think it is appropriate to modify the award made by the Labour Court to the extent of reducing it to back wages awarded by 50% . It is submitted by Shri Aruneshwar Gupta, learned Counsel, that the post of Octroi Nakedar has been abolished. If that is so, the respondent may be fitted in any other equivalent post. The appeal is disposed of accordingly.