High CourtsSingle Bench(2024) 04 UK CK 0053

Vijay Yadav vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 10 April 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravindra Maithani, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 642 Of 2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 177 words

Ravindra Maithani, J

1.

Applicant Vijay Yadav is in judicial custody in Case Crime No.169 of 2023, under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station- Kelakhera, District-Udham Singh Nagar. He has sought his release on bail.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3.

Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the main accused has already been granted bail; in the offences, on the basis of which the instant FIR has been lodged, the applicant has already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court; applicant is not a previous convict.

4.

Learned State Counsel does not deny these facts.

5.

Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.

6.

The bail application is allowed.

7.

Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.