High CourtsSingle Bench(2026) 05 DEL CK 1722

Vijay Sehgal vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi Through Mr Sanjeev Kumar Assit Engineer Bldg

Delhi High Court, Principal Bench, New Delhi · Decided on 13 May 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sachin Datta, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
CONT.CAS(C) 858/2026 and CM APPL.32328/2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 233 words

SACHIN DATTA, J. (ORAL)

CM APPL.32327/2026 (Exemption)

1.

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2.

The application stands disposed of.

CONT.CAS(C) 858/2026

3.

The present petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging wilful disobedience/ non-compliance of the directions contained in the order dated 14.05.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) 6385/2025. The operative directions therein are as under:-

Exhibit reproduced from the original judgment
Exhibit reproduced from the original judgment
4.

At the outset, learned counsel for the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) who appears on advance notice, submits that the petitioner’s application for de-sealing of the property is under consideration. He submits that the MCD is also required to verify and examine the sanctioned building plan in respect of the property in question and compare the same with the existing construction presently standing at the property.

5.

He further submits that if no impediment is found upon conclusion of the aforesaid exercise currently being undertaken by the MCD, the petitioner’s application will be duly considered and an appropriate order shall be passed under intimation to the petitioner.

6.

In the circumstances, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition at this stage. The same is consequently disposed of along with pending application.

7.

The MCD is directed to conclude the aforesaid exercise as expeditiously as possible.

8.

If the petitioner is aggrieved with the outcome of the aforesaid exercise, he shall be at liberty to avail appropriate legal remedies.