High CourtsDivision Bench(1997) 09 AHC CK 0040

Vijay Prakash vs Collector of Central Excise

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 2 September 1997 · Citation: (1998) 75 ECR 523 : (1999) 105 ELT 562

HON’BLE JUDGES
R.K. Gulati, J · Om Prakash, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 275 of 1994

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 217 words
1.

The petitioner seeks quashing of the impugned order passed by the Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, Annexure-6 to the Writ petition.

2.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that remedy of reference under Gold (Control) Act, 1968 is not available to the assessee against the Tribunal''s order, inasmuch as the Act stood repealed on 6-6-1990. In this connection, Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 may be usefully referred. Clause (e) of Section 6 of that Act when properly read, states that where any Central Act made after the commencement of the General Clauses Act repeals any enactment hitherto made, then unless a different intention appears the repeal shall not affect any investigation, legal proceeding or remedy in respect of any such right, privilege, obligation, liability, penalty, forfeiture or punishment as aforesaid and any such investigation, legal proceeding or remedy may be instituted, continued or enforced, and any such penalty, forfeiture or punishment may be imposed as if the repealing Act has not been passed.

(emphasis supplied)

3.

From a perusal of Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, it is clear that the remedy of reference will not be affected, which the petitioner may avail in accordance with law.

4.

The petition is dismissed on the ground of alternative statutory remedy of reference.