Supreme CourtDivision Bench(1980) 11 SC CK 0003

Vijay Nath Awasthi vs State of U.P.

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 14 November 1980 · Citation: AIR 1981 SC 1625 : (1981) 2 SCC 23 : (1981) SCC(Cri) 313 : (1981) 13 UJ 54

HON’BLE JUDGES
S. Murtaza Fazal Ali, J · A. D. Koshal, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Appeal No. 200 of 1974

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 247 words

Fazal Ali, J.—This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court upholding the conviction of the appellant under Section. 161 of the Indian Penal Code and section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act as also the sentence of two years awarded on each count to run concurrently. 2. We have gone through the judgment of the High Court & have been taken through the evidence. According to the prosecution case, the appellant demanded a bribe of Rs. 100/- from Ram kumar (PW 1 who paid it to the former after a complaint was made to additional District Magistrate and information was passed on the police who organised a trap. The fact that money was paid to the appellant is beyond doubt and, in fact, the appellant does not deny it. His stand was that money was surreptitiously put into is pocket and that as soon as he was accused of taking it by wasy of a bribe, he throw it away.

3.

Mr. Gupta, learned Counsel for the appellant, brought to our notice certain discrepancies in the evidence of the witnesses, but after having gone through the same, we are unable to interfere with its appraisal by the two courts below. There is no reason, factual or leal, such as may persuade us to exercise the special jurisdiction of this Court under Article 136 of the constitution.

4.

We therefore find no merit in this appeal which is accordingly dismissed