High CourtsDivision Bench(2024) 06 AHC CK 0016

Vijay Kumar Yadav vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Others

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 25 June 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Attau Rahman Masoodi, J · Ajai Kumar Srivastava I, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 4459 Of 2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 198 words

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State.

This petition seeks issuance of a direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned F.I.R. registered as Case Crime/F.I.R. No. 0098 of 2024 under Sections 341, 308, 323, 504, 506 and 286 I.P.C., Police Station Maheshganj, district Pratapgarh.

The punishment for the offences mentioned in the impugned F.I.R. is less than seven years.

In view of the order proposed to be passed in this writ petition, issuance of notice to the opposite party no. 4 is dispensed with.

Learned Additional Government Advocate looking to the gravity of punishment being less than seven years has stated that the provisions of Section 41-A Cr.P.C. shall be strictly followed in terms of judgment rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in a case reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273: Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and another.

The present petition deserves to be disposed of in terms of the statement made by learned A.G.A.

Accordingly, this petition is disposed of in view of the provisions of Section 41-A Cr.P.C. and the law as laid down by Apex Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar (supra).