Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench(2021) 03 NCDRC CK 0052

Victor Veigas vs Rekha Prabhu & Anr.

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission · Decided on 24 March 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dinesh Singh, Presiding Member
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Revision Petition No. 2226 Of 2016

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 166 words
1.

This revision petition (execution) has been filed under section 21(b) of the Act 1986, challenging an Order dated 22.10.2007 passed under section 27A.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the light of Hon'ble Supreme Court 's Order dated 06.05.2019 in Karnataka Housing Board vs. K.A. Nagamani (2019) 6 SCC 424, it is clear that revision under section 21(b) does not lie against an order passed under Section 27A of the Act 1986.

3.

Remedy against an Order passed under section 27A of the Act 1986 (corresponding section 73 of the Act 2019) does not lie under section 21(b) of the Act 1986 (corresponding section 58(1)(b) of the Act 2019).

4.

The instant revision petition (execution) is dismissed as not maintainable.

5.

The Registry is requested to send a copy each of this Order to the respondents and to the District Commission within three days from today. The stenographer is requested to upload this Order on the website of this Commission today itself.