High Courts(1902) 10 MAD CK 0016

Venkatasamy Naidu vs Rangasamy Naidu

Madras High Court · Decided on 2 October 1902 · Citation: (1903) 13 MLJ 428

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 123 words
1.

We are of opinion that the defendant is legally bound. In Exhibit A the defendant who was a party thereto, although he did not sign it, undertook to discharge the debt of Rs. 1,704-3-6 due by the plaintiff to Krishnasamy Naidu. The defendant having failed to discharge it, the plaintiff himself paid it and now seeks to recover it from defendant.

2.

Assuming for the sake of argument that the defendant'' undertaking was not founded on valuable consideration, but only on good consideration, viz, love and affection for his brother (the plaintiff), Exhibit A having been registered, the breach of such obligation becomes actionable u/s 25. of the Indian Contract Act. The costs of this reference will be costs in the cause.