High CourtsDivision Bench(1910) 02 MAD CK 0060

Venkatasami Naicken and Another vs Ramanthan Chettiar and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 15 February 1910 · Citation: 5 Ind. Cas. 916(1)

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sankaran Nair, J · Munro, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 144 words
1.

Under the judgment of the Privy Council in Umeschunder Sircar v. Zahur Fatima 18 C. 164 : 17 I.A. 201 the plaintiffs are entitled to interest calculated according to the mortgage deed and not according to the decree. The case of Ganga Das Bhattar v. Jogendranath Mitra 5 CRI.L.J. 315 : 11 C.W.N. 403 relied upon by the District Judge, has been dissented from in Thenappa Chettiar v. Marimuthu Nadan 31 M. 258 : M.L.J. 344 : 4 M.L.T. 293 which follows Umeschunder Sircar v. Zahur Fatima 18 C. 164 : 17 I.A. 201. We must, therefore, ask the District Judge to find on this basis, the proportionate amount which plaint item No. 4 is liable to contribute.

2.

The finding should be submitted with in four weeks from the date of this order and seven days will be allowed for filing objection.