High Courts(1896) 12 MAD CK 0004

Venkatappayya and Others vs Venkatapathi and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 4 December 1896 · Citation: (1897) 7 MLJ 84

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 145 words
1.

We do not think that the general principles of justice as to hearing the other side is applicable to this case, since the words in the section. ""on the

perusal of the application"" clearly indicate nothing else than that perusal is required of the Judge before giving his sanction. These words render

untenable the position that the Judge is bound to do more, that is in the way of giving notice, hearing parties, and so on, if the application itself

satisfies him. If any such regular preliminary enquiry had been intended the language of the section must have been very different.

2.

We, therefore, hold the Judge was wrong in considering the sanction void for want of notice prior to its being granted.

3.

We reverse his decree and remand the suit for disposal according to law. Costs to abide and follow the event.