AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
We do not think that the general principles of justice as to hearing the other side is applicable to this case, since the words in the section. ""on the
perusal of the application"" clearly indicate nothing else than that perusal is required of the Judge before giving his sanction. These words render
untenable the position that the Judge is bound to do more, that is in the way of giving notice, hearing parties, and so on, if the application itself
satisfies him. If any such regular preliminary enquiry had been intended the language of the section must have been very different.
We, therefore, hold the Judge was wrong in considering the sanction void for want of notice prior to its being granted.
We reverse his decree and remand the suit for disposal according to law. Costs to abide and follow the event.
