High CourtsDivision Bench(1910) 03 MAD CK 0073

Venkaraju Venkatasami and Another vs Emperor

Madras High Court · Decided on 30 March 1910 · Citation: 7 Ind. Cas. 176

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sankaran Nair, J · Munro, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 168 words
1.

The two accused in this case signed a bail bond with names which were not their own, and have been convicted u/s 465 of the Indian Penal Code of forgery by making a false document. We do not think the conviction can stand u/s 464 of the Indian Penal Code. A person makes a false document who dishonestly or fraudulently signs a document with the intention of causing it to be believed that the document was signed by a person by whom he knows it was not signed. Now in this case, the accused had before signing said to the Sub-Magistrate that their names were the names they after wards signed to the bail bond. There could, therefore, be no intention to cause the Sab-Magistrate to believe that the bail bond was signed by any person real or fictitious other than the accused.

2.

We, therefore, set aside the conviction, acquit the accused of forgery u/s 465 of the Indian Penal Code and direct their immediate release.