High CourtsDivision Bench(1915) 02 MAD CK 0035

Vemooru Audi Narayaniah vs Panchagnula Sreeramulu and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 22 February 1915 · Citation: AIR 1916 Mad 896 : 29 Ind. Cas. 785

HON’BLE JUDGES
John Wallis, C.J · Coutts-Trotter, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 79 words
1.

We agree with the District Judge that the suit is clearly barred. The plaintiff''s evidence that he came to know 3 1/2 years before suit is inconsistent with evidence of his mother, and the general evidence clearly shows that the plaintiff must have been aware that the 1st defendant was being put forward as the adopted son of his grandfather much more than six years before the institution of this suit.

2.

The appeal is dismissed with costs.