High CourtsDivision Bench(2022) 04 DEL CK 0225

Veena Madan vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 28(2) & Anr.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 27 April 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manmohan, J · Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 6670 Of 2022, Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 20240-20241 Of 2022

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 217 words

Manmohan, J

1.

Present Writ Petition has been filed challenging the assessment order dated 7th December, 2019 passed under Section 147 read with 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘Act’), the penalty orders dated 15th March, 2022 passed under Section 271(1)(c), 271(1)(b) and 271F of the Act for the Assessment Year 2012-13.

2.

A perusal of the paper book reveals that petitioner has already filed an appeal before the CIT(A) challenging the impugned assessment order. Consequently, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the impugned assessment order in the writ jurisdiction.

3.

Since the time period for filing the appeal to challenge the penalty  orders has expired, this Court permits the petitioner to file an appeal before the appellate authority challenging the penalty orders within two weeks. In the event, the said appeal is filed within two weeks, the same shall not be dismissed on the ground of limitation.

4.

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) is directed to decide the appeals filed by the petitioner as expeditiously as possible preferably within six months.

5.

With the aforesaid direction, the present writ petition and application stand disposed of. This Court clarifies that it has not commented on the merits of the controversy. The rights and contentions of all the parties are left open.