High CourtsSingle Bench(2011) 12 KAR CK 0403

Varamalakshmi Thammaiah vs State, Shankar, Nandish and Satish

Karnataka High Court · Decided on 14 December 2011

HON’BLE JUDGES
A.S. Pachhapure, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Revision Petition No. 629 of 2011

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 196 words

A.S. Pachhapure

1.

The counsel for the petitioner is absent

2.

Perused the records. The petitioner, PW-8 is the wife of the deceased Gayarahalli Tammayya who is said to have been murdered by the respondents 2 to 4.

3.

in the trial, the respondents 2 to 4 have been acquitted. Aggrieved by the acquittal, the present revision petition has been filed.

4.

The office has raised an objection regarding the maintainability of the revision petition

5.

the provision u/s 372 of Cr.P.C were amended by the Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act 2008 and the victim has been conferred with a right to prefer an appeal against any order passed by the Court acquitting the accused, the trial Court acquitted the respondents Nos. 2 to 4 vide the judgment and order dated: 30.07.2010 i.e. consequent to the amendment. Hence, the petitioner has a right to prefer an appeal and that revision is not maintainable

6.

Hence, the revision petition is dismissed as not maintainable, The petitioner is at liberty to file an Appeal against the acquitted respondents.

7.

Office is directed to return the records forthwith to enable the petitioner to have recourse to the remedy.