High CourtsDivision Bench(1901) 11 MAD CK 0004

Valambal and Another vs Logambal Ammal and Another

Madras High Court · Decided on 29 November 1901 · Citation: (1902) 12 MLJ 94

HON’BLE JUDGES
Moore, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 145 words

Moore, J.—It is impossible to uphold, the order of the Subordinate Judge in so far as Valambal is concerned. There is nothing in Section

258 of the CPC to warrant the conclusion arrived at by the Subordinate Judge that it is only when the decree-holder fails to certify u/s 258 that the

judgment-debtor can apply under paragraph 2 of that Section. That paragraph gives her full liberty to apply as soon as she has paid the money and

when she does so the Court is bound to enquire into the matter after issue of notice to the decree-holder and also, of course, to the assignee of the

decree if it is alleged that there has been any assignment. The Subordinate Judge is directed to do so now and to dispose of Valaiubal''s application

on the merits of the case. This petition is allowed with costs.