Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2026) 06 ITAT CK 1773

Vaish Samvay Samiti vs CIT(E)

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi · Decided on 24 June 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vimal Kumar, Judicial Member · S. Rifaur Rahman, Accountant Member
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
ITA No. 3949/Del/2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 186 words

PER SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN :

1.

The assessee has filed these appeals against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Delhi [“Ld. CIT(E)”, for short] dated 24.02.2026 for the u/s 12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the “Act” for short).

2.

Heard both the parties and perused the material on record. We observed that the ld. CIT(E) rejected the application for registration u/s 12AB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’) without giving any opportunity of being heard to the assessee. In our considered view and in the interest of justice, assessee should be given one more opportunity of being heard on merit. Therefore, we direct ld. CIT(E) to give an opportunity of being heard to the assessee and decide the issue on merit as per law. We also direct assessee to make proper submissions and appear before the ld. CIT(E) on the date of hearing and cooperate with the tax authorities. Accordingly, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

3.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.