High CourtsDivision Bench(1893) 09 MAD CK 0022

Vaidyanatha Ayyar and Others vs Chinnasami Naik

Madras High Court · Decided on 4 September 1893 · Citation: (1894) ILR (Mad) 108

HON’BLE JUDGES
Muttusami Ayyar, J · Best, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 126 words
1.

There can be no doubt that a surviving partner can sue alone for the recovery of a partnership debt, and, in that case, no certificate will be

necessary. On this point we agree with the Bombay High Court in Motilal Bechardoss v. Ghellabhai Hariram ILR 17 Bom. 6

2.

We are also of opinion that the suit is maintainable if brought by the surviving partner conjointly with the heir of the deceased partner. In the

latter case a certificate of heirship will be necessary, unless it appears, on the face of the document sued on, that the debt is a coparcenary debt--

compare Venkataramanna v. Venkayya ILR 14 Mad. 377

3.

The above is, we think, a sufficient answer to the questions referred to us.