High CourtsDivision Bench(1910) 09 MAD CK 0017

Vagadhu and Another vs Haddu Maharanna and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 19 September 1910 · Citation: 7 Ind. Cas. 870(1)

HON’BLE JUDGES
Krishnaswami Aiyar, J · Abdur Rahim, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 94 words
1.

The parties stipulated that in case the Government dispossessed the plaintiffs of the lands purchased by them from the defendant, the latter would have to refund the purchase money. The Munsif seems to think that such a stipulation is unlawful. He is quite wrong in that view. The suit must be decreed with costs throughout and the plaintiffs shall have a decree for the amount claimed against the defendants Nos. 4 to 6 personally and against the defendants Nos. 1 to 3 to the extent of the joint family property in their hands.