High CourtsSingle Bench(2012) 01 MAD CK 0077

V. Rajaram vs The Law Secretary Law Department Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Fort St. George Chennai, The Secretary Bar Council of Tamil Nadu Chennai and M.G. Regunath Advocate, 82-C, Rajaji Nagar, Bangalore Bye-Pass Road, Krishnagiri and District - 635001

Madras High Court · Decided on 11 January 2012

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vinod K. Sharma, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 30173 of 2011

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 197 words

Honourable Mr. Justice Vinod K. Sharma

1.

The petitioner, being aggrieved by the act of respondent no.3, has approached this Court for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari, to

quash the order dated 13.09.2011 passed by the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu, in dismissing the complaint of misconduct, filed against the

respondent no. 3.

2.

The remedy with the petitioner is to file statutory appeal under the Advocates Act to the Bar Council of India.

3.

In view of the availability of alternative statutory remedy of appeal, this writ petition is dismissed. The petitioner, if so advised, can avail the

remedy of statutory appeal in accordance with law.

4.

The other grievance of the petitioner is for prosecuting respondent no.3 and also for recovery of loss suffered due to his negligence. This

grievance of the petitioner also cannot be adjudicated in exercise of writ jurisdiction, as the remedy with petitioner is to file civil suit or criminal

complaint in accordance with law, if so advised.

5.

In view of the fact that the petitioner has alternative remedy to redress his grievance, as noticed herein-above, this writ petition is dismissed as

not competent. No costs.