High CourtsSingle Bench(2011) 03 MAD CK 0448

V. Andal vs The Tahsildar

Madras High Court · Decided on 21 March 2011

HON’BLE JUDGES
M. Jaichandren, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 6440 of 2011

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 233 words

M. Jaichandren, J.—Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the Respondent.

2.

By consent of both the parties, the writ petition is taken up for final hearing and disposal.

3.

At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if the Respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 21.6.2010, on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified period.

4.

The learned Special Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the Respondent, has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court.

5.

In view of the submissions made by the learned Counsels appearing on either side, the Respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 21.6.2010, on merits and in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the Petitioner, and to the other persons concerned, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The Petitioner is directed to furnish a copy of the representation, dated 21.6.2010, to the Respondent, along with a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this Court, by this order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter.

The writ petition is disposed of, with the above directions. No costs.