High CourtsSingle Bench(2020) 07 SHI CK 0085

Uttam Chand vs Manisha Nanda & Others

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 21 July 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sandeep Sharma, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
COPCT No. 494 Of 2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 182 words

Sandeep Sharma, J

1.

Supplementary affidavit in terms of order dated 7.7.2020, is stated to have been filed, but the same is not on record. Registry to trace and place the same on record, if in order.

2.

Learned counsel representing the petitioner while fairly admitting the factum with regard to receipt of pension, contends that though petitioner has been paid pension w.e.f.1.1.2018, but as per the order/judgment alleged to have been violated, he is entitled to pension w.e.f.31.3.2012 from the date of his superannuation. In the aforesaid background, learned counsel representing the petitioner states that at this stage, he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate court of law qua the arrears of the pension.

3.

Consequently, in view of the above, this Court sees no reason to keep the present petition alive and as such, same is accordingly closed. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate Court of law qua surviving grievances i.e. arrears of pension. Notice issued to the respondent is hereby discharged accordingly.