AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned Public
Prosecutor and perused the impugned order as well as the FIR.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no
offence under Section 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120-B IPC is made
out against the petitioner, however, petitioner is apprehending her
arrest in connection with FIR No.75/2015 PS-Nohar, District
Hanumangarh.
After considering the entire facts and circumstances of the
case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant
accused. Therefore, the instant anticipatory bail application is
hereby dismissed. However, the petitioner is a lady, therefore,
liberty is granted to the petitioner to surrender before the
concerned Magistrate and file regular bail application under
proviso to Section 437 Cr.P.C before the concerned Magistrate
within a period of fifteen days from the date of receiving certified
copy of this order.
In the event of filing such application after surrender, the
concerned Magistrate shall decide the said application filed by the
accused applicant on the same day while considering the fact that
applicant on the same day while considering the fact that
applicant is a woman having small children and as per proviso to
Section 437(1) Cr.P.C. being woman she can be released on bail
because investigation has already been conducted and no useful
purpose would be served to sent the petitioner behind the bars.
Petitioner shall appear before the court concerned on or before
20.03.2017, till then she may not be arrested.