High CourtsDivision Bench(1886) 02 CAL CK 0018

Upendra Nath Dhal vs Soudamini Dasi

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 5 February 1886 · Citation: (1885) ILR (Cal) 535

HON’BLE JUDGES
McDonell, J · Beverley, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 103 words

McDonell and Beverley, JJ.—We think that the Sessions Judge is right. A Magistrate has no power to make an order u/s 488 of the Code of Criminal-Procedure for maintenance at a progressively increasing rate. Under that section the allowance must be ordered at a fixed monthly rate, but u/s 489 it may be altered from time to time. We accordingly set aside that part of the Deputy Magistrate''s order which directs a prospective increase in the rate, and direct that the allowance be levied at the rate of Rs. 1-8 only per mensem till such time as it may be altered u/s 480.