High CourtsSingle Bench(2026) 05 DEL CK 1913

Upender @ Upendra Tej Singh Tomar & Ors. vs State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Delhi High Court, Principal Bench, New Delhi · Decided on 22 May 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Jain, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
CRL.M.C. 4096/2026 & CRL.M.A. 16564/2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 547 words
1.

Petitioners herein seek quashing of FIR No. 0340/2019 dated 14.11.2019, registered at Police Station Mayur Vihar PH-I, Delhi, for commission of offences under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.

2.

The marriage between complainant (respondent No.2 herein) and petitioner No.1 was solemnized on 28.11.2012 as per Hindu rites and Ceremonies. One girl child was born from the abovesaid wedlock.

3.

However, on account of temperamental differences, the parties started residing separately and when a complaint was lodged by respondent No.2, it resulted into registration of the abovesaid FIR.

4.

Charge-sheet has already been filed. It is submitted that during the pendency of the matter, the father-in-law of respondent No.2 has already expired.

5.

In the interregnum, both the parties have entered into a comprehensive Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) dated 12.11.2024 executed before the Counselling Cell, Family Courts, Karkardooma Courts, East District, Delhi and have been able to resolve all their disputes and have decided to part ways, gracefully. The custody of the child would remain with the mother i.e. respondent No.2, with no visitation rights to petitioner No.1.

6.

It is in the abovesaid backdrop that quashing is being sought.

7.

Respondent no. 2 is present in-person in Court along with her father and she has been duly identified by her counsel as well as by Investigating Officer.

8.

When asked, respondent No. 2 reiterated the terms of the settlement. She submits that there is already a divorce between them by way of mutual consent on 26.05.2025. She states that she has agreed to accept a total sum of Rs.3,00,000/- as full and final settlement in lieu of istridhan, alimony, maintenance for self (past, present and future). She submits that she has already received Rs.2,00,000/- and the balance amount of Rs.1,00,000/- has been received today in the shape of Demand Draft drawn on State Bank of India. She states that she has entered into the abovesaid settlement out of her own free will, without any coercion and influence from any corner whatsoever and therefore, she would have ‘no objection’ if FIR in question is quashed.

9.

In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, continuing with criminal proceedings would serve no useful purpose, especially, when dispute does not involve any public interest and is, primarily, private in nature. In any case, even the complainant does not wish to press any charges against the petitioners.

10.

Accordingly, exercising inherent powers vested in this Court under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, it is deemed appropriate to quash the instant FIR.

11.

Consequently, to secure the ends of justice, FIR No. 0340/2019 dated 14.11.2019, registered at Police Station Mayur Vihar PH-I, Delhi, for commission of offences under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, is, hereby, quashed subject to petitioners depositing cost of Rs. 10,000/- in the account of Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee (DHCLSC) within four weeks.

12.

Proof of deposit of the cost as well as Original affidavits and MoU of the parties, shall be submitted before the learned Trial Court within further two weeks from today.

13.

The present petition stands disposed of in aforesaid terms.

14.

Pending application also stands disposed of.