High CourtsSingle Bench(2022) 02 DEL CK 0085

United Telecoms Ltd vs Bharat Broadband Network Ltd.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 14 February 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Suresh Kumar Kait, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Original Miscellaneous Petition (T) (COMM.) No. 23 Of 2022, Miscellaneous Application No. 2446 Of 2022

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

24 paragraphs · 381 words

Suresh Kumar Kait, J

1.

The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 15(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of a Sole

Arbitrator in substitution.

2.

For adjudication of the disputes with respondent, this Court by order dated 25.04.2019 [ in OMP. (I) (COMM) No. 125/2019] had appointed Mr.

Justice (Retd.) Jagannadha Rao, the sole Arbitrator. According to petitioner, the learned Arbitrator had to adjudicate two cases APO-I and APO-II.

The arbitral proceedings in respect of APO-II stood concluded and the arbitration award was rendered on 06.06.2021 and 07.07.2021 in respect

thereof. However, arguments in APO-I though commenced but could not be completed owing to illness of the Counsel and restraints of covid

pandemic.

3.

Learned counsel for petitioner has submitted that an email dated 21.09.2021 has been received from the learned sole arbitrator wherein he has

expressed his inability to hear the arguments in APO-I and, therefore, the present petition has been filed seeking appointment of a substituted

Arbitrator.

4.

Notice issued.

5.

Mr. Chandan N. Kamra, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent.

6.

Learned counsel for the parties submit that the case is at the advance stage of hearing arguments and this Court may appoint sole Arbitrator and

also grant one year time to the arbitral tribunal for preparing and pronouncing the Award. Learned counsel for the parties have jointly proposed the

name of Mr. Justice (Retd.) Mukul Mudgal for appointment as the sole Arbitrator.

7.

In view of the above, the present petition is allowed. At the joint request of counsel representing both the sides, Mr. Justice (Retd.) Mukul Mudgal,

former Chief Justice of Punjab and Haryana High Court, is appointed sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties. The tribunal is

granted one year time from today to hear the arguments and render the Award.

8.

The learned Arbitrator shall decide the fee after consultation with the parties.

9.

The learned Arbitrator shall ensure compliance of Section 12 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before commencing the arbitration. Needless

to say, all issues are left open for adjudication and consideration by the learned Arbitrator.

10.

A copy of this order be sent to the learned Arbitrator for information.

11.

The petition and pending application are accordingly disposed of.