AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
K. Kannan, J.—The appeal arises out of the claim for compensation for death of a scooterist who fell down from the scooter and died. The legal representatives filed an application u/s 163(A) of the Motor Vehicles Act (hereinafter referred to as the ''Act''). The assumption before the Tribunal by the claimant was that Section 163(A) of the Act could be invoked, even if the death had been occasioned by negligence of the driver himself and every death by the use of motor vehicle would result in a justifiable cause of action.
I am afraid there is no such proposition possible for the provision u/s 163(A)(2) of the Act which merely makes unnecessary the need to plead and establish that the accident was the result of any wrongful act or neglect on the part of the owner or vehicle concerned or any other person. If the cause of action is the death of the owner of the vehicle who died by his own neglect, I do not think that Section 163(A) of the Act would apply at all. The claim is untenable and the award cannot be sustained in law. The award is set aside and the appeal is allowed.