Tribunals and Commissions(1992) 10 NCDRC CK 0020

United India Insurance Company Ltd. vs MEHTA ROAD LINES

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission · Decided on 1 October 1992 · Citation: 1993 1 CPJ 172

HON’BLE JUDGES
S.A.Shah , R.K.Shah J.
RESULT
Complaint disposed of

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 228 words
1.

THE complainant has realised that after the decision of the Hon''ble National Commission, the complaint by subrogatee (Insurance Company) will not be entertained since the Insurance Company is not the consumer.

2.

WE have, in another matter, decided that if a complaint is file by the Insurance Company alongwith the consumer, such complaint can be entertained. Mr. Panchal, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant therefore seeks permission to withdraw the complaint to enable his client to file a fresh complaint or file a civil suit with proper parties since there is a technical defect of proper parties. Mr. Rakesh Mazumdar appearing for the opposite party was shown the application but he has no submission to make. This question has been arisen after the decision of the Hon''ble National Commission in the case of M/s. Green Transport Company v. New India Assurance Company Ltd. reported in II (1992) CPJ Page 349 (NC). According to our opinion, there is no reason to deny the withdrawal since Mr. Panchal wants it to avoid technical difficulties in future. The purshish is taken on record. ORDER Permission as sought by Mr. Pancha1 is granted. The complainant can file a fresh complaint joining proper parties and/or file a civil suit as per their desire. The complaint is disposed of accordingly, with no order as to costs. Complaint disposed of. _____________