High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 04 DEL CK 0258

United Carpets (India) & Ors vs State (NCT Of Delhi) & Anr

Delhi High Court · Decided on 2 April 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Revision Petition No. 170 Of 2017

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 342 words

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J

CRL.REV.P. 170/2017 & Crl.M.A.3723/2017 (stay)

1.

The petitioner impugns order dated 27.01.2017 whereby the appeal of the petitioner was dismissed in default. The petitioner had filed an appeal impugning the judgment dated 24.06.2016 convicting of an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act.

2.

The subject cheque was of Rs.7,15,000/-. Parties have settled their disputes. Petitioner has settled and agreed to pay the settlement amount of Rs.9,00,000/- over and above the amount of Rs.1,50,000/-which was paid at the time of settlement before the Trial Court, which amount was forfeited by the respondent.

3.

Out of the settlement amount of Rs.9,00,000/-, a sum of Rs.8,50,000/- has already been paid. The balance sum of Rs.50,000/-has been paid in Court today by way of a cheque No.481606 dated 07.04.2018 drawn on Canara Bank.

4.

The petitioner, who appears in person, undertakes that the cheque shall be honoured on its presentation. The undertaking is accepted.

5.

The respondent is present in Court in person. He submits that he has no objection to the compounding of the subject offence.

6.

In view of the fact that the parties have settled their disputes and the entire settlement amount has already been paid to the respondent, in exercise of powers under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, the subject offence is compounded. The petitioner shall pay costs equivalent to 15% of the cheque amount (i.e. Rs.1,07,500/-) to the Delhi State Legal Services Authority in terms of the judgment of the Supreme Court in Damodar S.Prabhu versus Sayed Babalal H., 2010(5) SCC 663.

7.

Let the amount be deposited with the Delhi State Legal Services Authority within a period of two weeks from today. The receipt be furnished to the Trial Court within a period of three weeks from today.

8.

Subject to the payment of the said amount, the subject offence is compounded and the petitioner would be deemed to be acquitted.

9.

The petition is, accordingly, disposed of in the above terms.

10.

Order Dasti under the signatures of the Court Master.