Tribunals and Commissions(1997) 05 NCDRC CK 0010

UNIT TRUST OF INDIA vs Ram Kishan Chawla

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission · Decided on 30 May 1997 · Citation: 1997 2 CPC 482 : 1997 2 CPR 135 : 1998 1 CPJ 23

HON’BLE JUDGES
MALIK SHARIEF-UD-DIN , RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK J.

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 184 words
1.

AFTER going through the complaint and me version of the opposite party we find this is essentially a case where a disconnection has taken place for non -payment of the electric charges. The complainant has raised some other disputes such as non -sanctioning of load to the extent applied for and non -furnishing him the details of the instalment charges. While arguing we found that there is hardly any issue involved1 in the case which can bring it under the scope of the Consumer Protection Act and while debating this point Mr. Jugal Kishore makes an offer that he may be allowed to withdraw the complaint and taken up the matter in arbitration under the provisions of the Electricity Supply Act. He wants permission to do so. We are of the view that in order to put an end to the dispute the offer is fair. We allow Mr. Jugal Kishore to withdraw the complaint and file an application with the concerned Authorities for refering the dispute to arbitration. With these remarks the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Complaint dismissed as withdrawn. _