High CourtsDivision Bench(2011) 01 KAR CK 0099

Union of India (UOI) and Another vs Sri Gurulal Singh Sandhu

Karnataka High Court · Decided on 3 January 2011 · Citation: (2011) 1 KCCR 594

HON’BLE JUDGES
K. Govindarajulu, J · Ajit J. Gunjal, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No''s. 29613-14 of 2010

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 164 words

Ajit J. Gunjal, J.—Even though the petitions are listed today for orders, with consent, petitions are taken up for final disposal.

2.

The Respondent herein has filed an application before the Central Administrative Tribunal questioning the non granting of promotion to the Grade of Commissioner and also for seeking consequential direction to convene a review DPC to consider his claim to the said post in the Pay Band-IV [37,400-67,000].

3.

Suffice it to say that the Central Administrative Tribunal directed the Petitioners to consider the claim of the Petitioner for promotion.

4.

Mr. N.R. Bhaskar, learned Senior Central Government Standing Counsel for Indirect Taxes files a memo indicating that the Respondent has been promoted to the rank of a Commissioner in terms of Office Order No. 32012/19/2009-AD-II on 9.12.2010.

5.

The said submission and the memo are placed on record. To our mind the petitions have become infructuous. Accordingly, petitions stand dismissed as having become infructous.

If Rule is issued the same stands discharged.