Supreme CourtDivision Bench(2009) 05 SC CK 0021

Union of India (UOI) and Another vs Manju G.S. and Others

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 11 May 2009

HON’BLE JUDGES
G. S. Singhvi, J · B. N. Agrawal, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal No. 3475 of 2009 (Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No. 11113 of 2007) and Civil Appeal No. 3476 of 2009 (Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No. 11750 of 2007)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 274 words
1.

Leave granted.

2.

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

3.

These appeals are directed against orders dated 8th March and 15th March, 2007 passed by the Division Bench of the Kerala High Court in Writ Appeal Nos. 626/2007 and 507/2007 respectively, which were preferred by the appellants against common order dated 6.12.2006 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition Nos. 30169/2006 and 29770/2006. The learned Single Judge disposed of the writ petitions and directed the Central Government to reconsider all the applications filed by Government Homeo Colleges at Trivandrum and Kozhikode and grant approval with retrospective effect, in case it came to the conclusion that approval can be granted, and regularize courses already commenced by the two colleges. The learned Single Judge also directed Vice Chancellors of the Universities to grant affiliation to the two courses with retrospective effect from 1st May, 2005 and conduct examination without delay. The Division Bench dismissed the appeals preferred by the appellants.

4.

A bare perusal of the impugned orders show that the same are non- speaking, inasmuch as issues raised by the appellants were not at all considered by the Division Bench. In our view, where intricate issue like grant of approval to the colleges and/or courses was decided by the learned Single Judge, the Division Bench was obliged to decide the appeals on merits. The same having not been done, the impugned orders are liable to be set aside.

5.

The civil appeals are, accordingly, allowed, impugned orders are set aside and the matters are remitted to the High Court to decide the appeals afresh after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties.