Supreme CourtFull Bench(2000) 12 SC CK 0051

Union of India vs Satish Panalal Shah

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 6 December 2000 · Citation: (2001) 249 ITR 221

HON’BLE JUDGES
Y. K. Sabharwal, J · S. P. Bharucha, J · N. Santosh Hedge, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal 1157 of 1998 and Civil Appeal 1165 and 4514 of 1998 and 1999 & Civil Appeal No: 1157 of 1998, 1165 of 1998, 4514 of 1999

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 203 words
1.

The orders under challenge in these appeals by the Revenue followed the earlier judgment of the same High Court in the case of Pradip Ramanlal Sheth Vs. Union of India and Others, . Learned counsel for the Revenue states that the papers before us suggest that a SLP was preferred against that judgment but he has no instructions as to what happened thereafter. Learned counsel for the respondents states that their enquiries with the Registry reveal that no appeal against that judgment was preferred by the Revenue.

2.

If the Revenue did not accept the correctness of the judgment in the case of Pradip Ramanlal Sheth Vs. Union of India and Others, , it should have preferred an appeal there against and instructed counsel as to what the fate of that appeal was or why no appeal was filed. It is not open to the Revenue to accept that judgment in the case of the assessee in that case and challenge its correctness in the case of other assessees without just cause. For this reason, we decline to consider the correctness of the decision of the High Court in these matters and dismiss the civil appeals.

3.

No order as to costs.