High CourtsDivision Bench(2012) 09 BOM CK 0059

Union of India vs Mohd. Hanif Abdul Aziz

Bombay High Court · Decided on 28 September 2012 · Citation: (2012) 286 ELT 25

HON’BLE JUDGES
M.S. Sanklecha, J · J.P. Devadhar, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Fera Appeal No. 22 of 2009 in Appeal No. 403 of 2001

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 217 words
1.

Whether the Appellate-Tribunal for Foreign Exchange was justified in deleting the penalty imposed upon the partners of the firm on the ground that the penalty against the firm has been confirmed is the question raised in this appeal. This Court in the case of Overseas Textiles Corporation v. Special Director, Enforcement Directorate and Anr. (FERA Appeal No. 57 of 2009) decided on 6-9-2012 has held that in the absence of lapses/negligence/mala fides on the partners of the firm in realizing the export proceeds, imposition of penalty, against the partners is unjustified especially when the penalty imposed against the firm has been confirmed. In view of the matter and looking to the facts of the present case, we see no reason to entertain the appeal.

2.

The decision of this Court in the case of Textoplast Industries Vs. Additional Commissioner of Customs, which is relied upon by the Counsel for the revenue is distinguishable on facts. In any event, it is not laid down in that case, that in every case once penalty is imposed upon the firm, penalty must also be imposed upon the partners. Therefore, in the facts of the present case, we see no reason to interfere with the order of the Tribunal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.