High CourtsDivision Bench(2026) 11 DEL CK 1378

Union Of India & Ors. vs Sgt Repaka Gopal (Retd)

Delhi High Court · Decided on 3 November 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Jyoti Singh, J · Gurvinder Pal Singh, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
W.P.(C) 15933/2026, CM APPL. 74702/2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

31 paragraphs · 855 words

JYOTI SINGH, J. (ORAL)

1.

These writ petitions are filed by Union of India challenging judgments of learned Armed Forces Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (Tribunal) granting disability pension to the Respondents herein. Details of the disability incurred by the Respondents during service along with the reasons of the Release Medical Boards, wherever available are given hereunder for ease of reference:-

Item No.WP(C) No.Name of RespondentDisabilityYears of serviceReasoning given by the RMB
201W.P.(C) 15933/2026SGT REPAKA GOPAL (RETD)Primary Hypertension20NANA as not posted in field areas, HAA, CIOPs or prolonged afloat service.
202W.P.(C) 8693/2026MAJ GEN SURENDER MOHAN VSM RETDPrimary Hypertension38NANA as the onset of disability occurred in peace area and was owing to lifestyle disorder.
203W.P.(C) 8729/2026EX NK MACP HAV VARINDER KUMARType-II Diabetes Mellitus21NANA as the onset of disability occurred in peace area.
204W.P.(C) 9437/2026EX HONY NB SUB MAHADEB GHOSHType-II Diabetes Mellitus24NANA as the onset of disability occurred in peace area and a metabolic disorder.
206W.P.(C) 10278/2026HAV LAVKUSH KUMAR SINGH RETD.Primary Hypertension24NANA as the onset of disability occurred in peace area.
207W.P.(C) 10938/2026COL. JOSE KP (RETD.)Systemic Hypertension and Type-II Diabetes Mellitus30NANA as the onset of disability occurred in peace area
208W.P.(C) 11036/2026SMT. GEETA KUMARICAD-SILENT AWWIPATENT EPICARDIAL CORONARIES POST AICD IMPLATATION (IN NYHA CLASS)25NANA as the onset of disability occurred in peace area.
209W.P.(C) 11463/2026NK BABU LAL GURJARPrimary Hypertension17NANA as the onset of disability occurred in peace area.
210W.P.(C) 12199/2026AIR CMDE N MUNIRATHNAMType-II Diabetes Mellitus34NANA as the onset of disability occurred in peace area and a metabolic disorder.
211W.P.(C) 12515/2026EX NK CHEF HARJINDER SINGHPrimary Hypertension17NANA as the onset of disability occurred in peace area.
212W.P.(C) 12569/2026EX NK JAGBIR SINGH DAGARPrimary Hypertension22NANA as the onset of disability occurred in peace area.
213W.P.(C) 19214/2025EX- HAV/CLK MAHESH PRASADGeneralized Tonic Colonic Seizure-34517Constitutional in nature.
214W.P.(C) 2843/2026WG CDR RAMESH CHAND BHATI RETD.Primary Hypertension35 (enrolled as Airman on 26.11.1982 and commissioned on 21.01.1997)NANA
215W.P.(C) 4809/2026EX NB SUB NARINDER SINGHGeneralized Seizure21NANA as the onset of disability occurred in peace area.
217W.P.(C) 5192/2026EX JWO PARAM NANDA BEHRAPrimary Hypertension32NANA as the onset of disability occurred in peace area.
218W.P.(C) 5267/2026COL DINESH DUTT SHARMA RETDPrimary Hypertension31NANA as the onset of disability occurred in peace area.
219W.P.(C) 5268/2026EX HFO RAMPAL SINGHComplete heart block on pacemaker37NANA
221W.P.(C) 5431/2026HFO DAL CHANDRA (RETD)Primary Hypertension37NANA as the onset of disability occurred in peace area.
223W.P.(C) 5718/2026GP CAPT AK MAINIType-II Diabetes Mellitus28NANA
225W.P.(C) 5911/2026EX HAV ASHWANI KR. SHARMAPrimary Hypertension and Type-II Diabetes Mellitus21NANA as the onset of disability occurred in peace area.
226W.P.(C) 6344/2026EX HAV RAM KUMAR SINGHOptic Atrophy both eyes and Pituitary Macroadenoma Nepa (D)-35.224NANA
228W.P.(C) 6619/2026EX JWO MD SAMIMPrimary Hypertension20No close time association with stress or strain or dietary compulsion and the onset of disability occurred in peace area.
229W.P.(C) 11667/2026COL RAJIV CHAUDHARY (RETD.)Primary Hypertension33 (Commissioned in SSC on 26.05.1986 and permanent commissioned on 10.04.2019)NANA as the onset of disability occurred in peace area.
231W.P.(C) 2859/2026COL VG BHATNAGAR (RETD)Primary HypertensionAlmost 28NANA
2.

Learned counsels for the Respondents submit that the writ petitions deserve to be dismissed as the cases of the Respondents are covered by the judgments of the Supreme Court in Dharamvir Singh v. Union of India and Others, (2013) 7 SCC 316 and Union of India & Another v Rajbir Singh, 2015 SCC OnLine SC 119 and several other judgments of Division Benches of this Court, including the judgment in Union of India and Others v. Ex Sub Gawas Anil Madso, 2025 SCC OnLine Del 2018, which has been upheld by the Supreme Court along with a batch of appeals in the judgment in Union of India & Others v. Col. NC Isaac (Retd), 2026 SCC OnLine SC 1895.

3.

Petitioners do not dispute that the cases of the Respondents are covered by the aforesaid judgments on different issues that arise in different writ petitions. It is now settled by the Supreme Court that: (a) only because the disability has arisen in peace area, it cannot be held as a thumb rule that the disability is neither attributable nor aggravated by military service; (b) if an individual enters service and there is no note in the record that he suffers from any pre-existing disease or illness, he shall be presumed to be of sound mental and physical health and the disability that arises during the course of W.P.(C) 15933/2026 and connected matters Page 11 of 12 service shall be attributable to and/or aggravated by military service; and (c) the onus of proof that the disability is neither attributable to nor aggravated by military service will be on the employer and the Medical Board will be required to give reason to hold so. Tribunal in the impugned judgments has followed these principles and we find no infirmity in the judgments warranting interference.

4.

Accordingly, all these writ petitions are dismissed as being devoid of merit and we direct the Petitioners to implement the judgments of the Tribunal, impugned before us and which we uphold, within a period of four months from today, save and except, the judgment impugned in W.P. (C) 5718/2026, which we are informed during the course of hearing by counsel for the Petitioner, has been implemented.

5.

All the aforesaid writ petitions stand disposed of with pending applications.